ArticlePeerJ2026
Treatment in cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy of surgical treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and to analyze factors associated with CSP subtypes. Methods: From 2013 to 2022, 265 patients diagnosed with CSP at the Gynecology Department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were retrospectively enrolled and classified into Type 1 ( Results: In the Type 1 group, 167 patients (84.3%) underwent hysteroscopic surgery, while 31 (15.7%) received laparoscopic intervention. In contrast, within the Type 2 group, 12 patients (17.9%) were treated with hysteroscopy, whereas 55 (82.1%) underwent laparoscopy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that age ≥ 30 years (OR = 0.385, 95% CI 0.206-0.722), total number of pregnancies ≥ 4 (OR = 1.738, 95% CI [0.815-3.706]), and an interval of ≥ 5 years since the last cesarean section (OR = 2.044, 95% CI [1.133-3.685]) were independently associated with CSP subtype (Type 2 Conclusions: In this cohort, treatment selection was individualized based on clinical evaluation. The surgical approach chosen in practice was strongly aligned with the CSP subtype, with both hysteroscopy and laparoscopy being demonstrated as feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.