Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004700›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Recovery of soil microbiota in naturally regenerating

Jenny Vivian, Michelle Scriver, Anastasija Zaiko, Alison Shapcott, Robin L Chazdon, Alexandra A Catling, David J Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jenny VivianForest Research Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.
Michelle ScriverSequench Ltd, Nelson, New Zealand.
Anastasija ZaikoSequench Ltd, Nelson, New Zealand.
Alison ShapcottForest Research Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.
Robin L ChazdonForest Research Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.
Alexandra A CatlingForest Research Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.
David J LeeForest Research Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest ecosystem restoration often focuses on the recovery of tree diversity and carbon stocks, with minimal attention given to soil microbial communities. Given the essential role of soil microorganisms for ecosystem health and recovery, this lack of understanding may limit reforestation success. In this study, we address this gap by analysing the taxonomic and functional characteristics of fungal and bacterial communities in minimally managed

Indexed as

AcaciaEcosystemMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaCarbonForestsFungiRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilCarbonRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilAcacia mangiumeDNAForest natural regenerationForest restorationHigh-throughput sequencingSoil bacteriaSoil fungiSoil microbial communitiesTropical forestTropical soil microbes

Identifiers

PMID42004700
PMCPMC13086022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.