ReviewAmerican journal of medicine open2026
Patient-Directed Discharge Among Hospitalized Persons With Opioid Use Disorder in the Fentanyl Era: A Scoping Review.
Review in American journal of medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient-directed discharge (PDD), also known as discharge against medical advice, is associated with poor outcomes, such as increased hospital readmission and mortality. PDD is 10-20 times more common among persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). This scoping review sought to describe the reported incidence in the fentanyl era and characterize relevant patient level, clinical care level and systems level risk factors that may contribute to this phenomenon. Methods: A comprehensive assessment of the literature was conducted across 4 electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Embase. The search strategy was designed to identify articles reporting PDD incidence and OUD in the era of fentanyl and other highly-potent synthetic opioids. Results: PDD incidence varies significantly by population; many studies report PDD rate in 10%-20% range and the incidence rate appears to be increasing over time. Younger patients with co-occurring stimulant use and OUD carry the highest rates of PDD. Studies examining the association between medications for OUD (MOUD) and decreased PDD report mixed findings, which likely reflects the impact of variability in medication selection and timing of administration. Consultation with addiction consult service (ACS) was not consistently associated with decreased PDD. Conclusions: Overall, there is increased rate of PDD in fentanyl era. More work is needed to characterize the relationship between MOUD provision and ACS with incidence of PDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.