Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004687›Full record

ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2026

Urinary biomarkers for lung cancer detection.

Alexandre Matov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microtubule regulation in cancer cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Modulation of the cytoskeleton for cancer therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexandre MatovDataSet Analysis LLC, 155 Jackson St, San Francisco, CA, 94111, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The current healthcare system relies largely on a passive approach toward disease detection, which typically involves patients presenting a "chief complaint" linked to a particular set of symptoms for diagnosis. Since all degenerative diseases occur slowly and initiate as changes in the regulation of individual cells within our organs and tissues, it is inevitable that with the current approach to medical care we are bound to discover some illnesses at a point in time when the damage is irreversible and meaningful treatments are no longer available. Methods: There exist organ-specific sets (or panels) of nucleic acids, such as microRNAs (miRs), which regulate and help to ensure the proper function of each of our organs and tissues. Thus, dynamic readout of their relative abundance can serve as a means to facilitate real-time health monitoring. With the advent and mass utilization of next-generation sequencing (NGS), such a proactive approach is currently feasible. Because of the computational complexity of customized analyses of "big data", dedicated efforts to extract reliable information from longitudinal datasets is key to successful early detection of disease. Results: Here, we present our results for the analysis of healthy donor samples and drug-naïve lung cancer patients' samples, for which we identify urinary biomarkers demonstrating that small RNAs can pass through the filtration by the kidneys. Conclusions: We provide a proof-of-principle that it is possible to perform non-invasive health monitoring by sequencing of urinary small RNAs and that traces of neoplastic transformation originating in organs that are not adjacent to the urinary tract, like the lungs, can also be detected in urine.

Indexed as

Disease detectionEarly diseaseLongitudinal analysisSmall RNA

Identifiers

PMID42004687
PMCPMC13084665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.