ArticleJournal of family violence2026
Substance Use-Related Social Reactions to Sexual Assault Disclosures: Results from Survivor - Informal Support Dyadic Qualitative Interviews.
Article in Journal of family violence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Ample research exists on social reactions to sexual assault (SA) disclosure from the survivor perspective, yet dyadic data with their informal supports remains scarce, particularly for substance-related social reactions. Method: The present study of 15 survivor-informal support dyads using interview data addresses this gap and examines how three relationship types: significant others (i.e., romantic partners), family, and friends differ in social reactions to substance-related SAs. Results: Results show that alcohol/drug's role in assaults entails a mixture of social reactions from informal support providers (SP) towards survivors, including positive reactions where SPs affirmed that the drinking and/or assault were not the survivor's fault, mixed reactions where SPs changed their perspective from initial blame to later realizing their response was wrong and becoming more supportive, and negative social reactions where SPs blamed victims for drinking/drug use. Conclusions: Education and training are needed to improve SPs' ability to avoid negative reactions to substance-involved assaults and increase their ability to recognize and communicate that such assaults are not the victim's fault.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.