Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004641›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Efficacy and Safety of Preservative-Free Bimatoprost 0.01% Gel in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: Results from Two Phase III Randomized Trials.

Jason Bacharach, Eydie Miller-Ellis, Paul Harasymowycz, James H Peace, Sylvie Nissle, Douglas G Day, Ingeborg Stalmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jason BacharachNorth Bay Eye Associates Inc, Sonoma County, CA, USA.
Eydie Miller-EllisScheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Paul HarasymowyczUniversity of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
James H PeaceUnited Medical Research Institute, Inglewood, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-9157-2021
Sylvie NissleLaboratoires Thea, Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France.
Douglas G DayCoastal Research Associates. Coastal Research Associates, Roswell, GA, USA.
Ingeborg StalmansDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel (PFB 0.01%) compared with BAK-preserved bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.01% (PB 0.01%) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods: In two international Phase III, randomized, investigator-masked trials, 951 patients with OAG or OHT and controlled intraocular pressure (IOP) at screening were randomized following washout to receive PFB 0.01% (n=468) or PB 0.01% (n=483) daily for 84 days. The primary endpoint was the mean IOP change from baseline at Weeks 6, and 12 at 8 am, 10 am, and 4 pm. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), conjunctival hyperemia, corneal fluorescein staining, ocular tolerance, and patient reported symptoms. Results: PFB 0.01% and PB 0.01% demonstrated similar IOP reductions at all time points (31-35% vs. 32-36%, respectively). Across the 12-week treatment period, between-group differences in IOP lowering were <1.0 mm Hg at all time points. A trend toward fewer patients reporting treatment-related ocular AEs was observed in the PFB 0.01% group compared with the PB 0.01% group (23.8% vs. 27.6%, respectively). Most common events included conjunctival hyperemia and eye irritation. There was a numerical trend in favor of PFB 0.01% in terms of presence of conjunctival hyperemia and CFS at Week 6 and Week 12. Conclusion: This pooled analysis of nearly 1000 patients confirmed the efficacy and safety outcomes observed in the individual Phase III pivotal studies, supporting the clinical use of preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% in the management of glaucoma and OHT.

Indexed as

bimatoprostglaucomaocular hypertensionophthalmic gelpreservative-free

Identifiers

PMID42004641
PMCPMC13086034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.