ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Efficacy and Safety of Preservative-Free Bimatoprost 0.01% Gel in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: Results from Two Phase III Randomized Trials.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel (PFB 0.01%) compared with BAK-preserved bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.01% (PB 0.01%) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods: In two international Phase III, randomized, investigator-masked trials, 951 patients with OAG or OHT and controlled intraocular pressure (IOP) at screening were randomized following washout to receive PFB 0.01% (n=468) or PB 0.01% (n=483) daily for 84 days. The primary endpoint was the mean IOP change from baseline at Weeks 6, and 12 at 8 am, 10 am, and 4 pm. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), conjunctival hyperemia, corneal fluorescein staining, ocular tolerance, and patient reported symptoms. Results: PFB 0.01% and PB 0.01% demonstrated similar IOP reductions at all time points (31-35% vs. 32-36%, respectively). Across the 12-week treatment period, between-group differences in IOP lowering were <1.0 mm Hg at all time points. A trend toward fewer patients reporting treatment-related ocular AEs was observed in the PFB 0.01% group compared with the PB 0.01% group (23.8% vs. 27.6%, respectively). Most common events included conjunctival hyperemia and eye irritation. There was a numerical trend in favor of PFB 0.01% in terms of presence of conjunctival hyperemia and CFS at Week 6 and Week 12. Conclusion: This pooled analysis of nearly 1000 patients confirmed the efficacy and safety outcomes observed in the individual Phase III pivotal studies, supporting the clinical use of preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% in the management of glaucoma and OHT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.