ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2026
Factors influencing the implementation of best clinical practices for hip fracture management in resource-constrained hospitals in China and co-design of quality improvement interventions: a qualitative study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for the ACTIVE trial: a multicentre, open-label, cluster-randomized controlled trial of a quality improvement programme for older adults with hip fracture in resource-limited hospitals in China.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Reappraising the fascia iliaca compartment block and pericapsular nerve group block for geriatric hip fractures: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hip fractures are a significant health issue for ageing populations, with high mortality and severe long-term effects, placing a substantial burden on healthcare systems worldwide, including in China. Although a multidisciplinary co-management model is regarded as best practice for hip fracture management, it typically involves shared care between orthopaedic teams and perioperative medical specialists such as geriatrics or internal medicine, working closely with nursing and rehabilitation staff. Its success depends on well-established medical and human resources, making implementation challenging in many settings. This study investigates the current management practices for hip fractures in county-level hospitals in China to inform development of targeted quality improvement interventions aimed at improving care. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in three sequential steps. In the first step, focus group interviews were conducted with multidisciplinary healthcare providers and hospital administrators from ten county-level hospitals across China. Guided by national clinical guidelines, these interviews aimed to identify barriers and facilitators influencing the quality of hip fracture management in older adults. The second step employed patient journey mapping to systematically analyze the treatment and management processes for hip fractures within these hospitals. In the third step, two rounds of clinician- and manager-led, evidence-informed co-design workshops were held, bringing together clinical staff including orthopaedics, internist and general practitioners, public health professionals and health management professionals to collaboratively identify areas to be intervened and develop specific interventions. Findings: A total of ten focus group discussions were conducted, one in each province, involving 137 participants. These discussions identified ten key barriers and ten facilitators influencing the quality of hip fracture care. The patient journey mapping documented the treatment process for hip fractures in older adults across ten county-level hospitals, highlighting issues such as surgical delays and inadequate multidisciplinary collaboration. The co-design workshops led to the development of three interventions: (1) optimization of in-hospital management processes, (2) empowerment of surgeons and physicians, and (3) enhancement of awareness among patients and their families. Interpretation: This study provides a comprehensive understanding of the challenges related to the management of hip fracture in resource-constrained county-level hospitals in China. The proposed interventions are expected to improve care quality and outcomes for patients with hip fractures in resource-constrained settings. Future efforts will focus on conducting randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. Funding: This study was supported by the Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support (code: ZLRK202310).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.