ArticleTranslational animal science2026
Does split-suckling influence pre- and postweaning pig growth performance and mortality?
Article in Translational animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A total of 1,513 sows and litters, approximately 505 litters per treatment, were used to determine the effects of two split-suckling protocols on litter growth performance and mortality pre- and postweaning compared to no split-suckling. Sows were blocked by parity and allotted to one of three treatments: no split-suckling (control), or one of two split-suckle protocols. The first split-suckle protocol was based on birth order, where the first 8 pigs born were marked at birth, and at the completion of farrowing, were removed from the sow for 45 min. After 45 min, the first 8 born pigs were returned to the sow and the unmarked pigs born later in the birth order were removed from the sow for 45 min. Then, all pigs were returned to the sow. The second split-suckling protocol was based on body weight (BW.) After farrowing was completed, the 8 heaviest pigs in the litter were removed from the sow for 90 min and then returned to the sow, completing the split-suckle treatment. Litters on either split-suckle treatment were split-suckled within 18 h of birth, after the completion of farrowing if litters were born during the day or the following morning for litters born overnight. Cross-fostering occurred after split-suckling within treatment by 24 h after the completion of farrowing. No differences were observed in litter size or pig weights at the time of split-suckling (d 1) or at weaning, and preweaning mortality did not differ between treatments. Preweaning mortality from split-suckle to weaning was also analyzed by birth weight category within treatment, light (≤1.2 kg), medium (1.2 < × ≤ 1.5 kg), and heavy (≥1.5 kg) pigs, and was not affected by treatment. When litters were evaluated by sow parity, timing of split-suckling (day of birth vs. the following morning), or functional teat count, no differences in preweaning mortality were observed among treatments. A subset of pigs was monitored through the nursery and finishing phases. No treatment differences were observed in average daily gain, average daily feed intake, gain-to-feed ratio, or mortality in either phase. Overall, the split-suckling protocols evaluated in this study did not influence pig growth performance or mortality during the pre- or postweaning periods compared to no split-suckling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.