ArticleAdvances in structural engineering2026
Machine learning-based prediction of tensile strength of glass fiber-reinforced polymer rebar under environmental conditions.
Article in Advances in structural engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GFRP rebar is a desirable alternative to steel rebar especially in harsh environments with advantages of light weight, high strength, stable chemical properties, and corrosion resistance. However, there is a lack of understanding on the durability of GFRP rebar which significantly limits its engineering applications. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to develop any simple theoretical model to predict the residual strength of GFRP rebar after environmental exposure. To effectively address this research gap, this paper investigates machine learning models to predict the residual tensile strength of GFRP rebar due to environmental degradation. Firstly, a database was built from the literature containing a total of 350 tensile testing results of GFRP rebar after experimental exposure. Six key influencing parameters were considered, including fiber content, bar diameter, resin type, exposure temperature, pH, and aging time. Secondly, machine learning models were trained and tested using the database, and the selected models included Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Long and Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models. The LSTM model demonstrated the best performance in strength prediction, achieving an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.