ReviewAIMS neuroscience2026
Addressing class imbalance in traumatic brain injury prognostication: A survey of resampling approaches.
Review in AIMS neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond classification metrics: a psychometric-aware benchmark for data augmentation in imbalanced student mental health surveys.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has attracted considerable interest, particularly in clinical and cognitive neuroscience applications. However, the problem of class imbalance often undermines the performance of classification algorithms and leads to biased predictions in favor of the majority class. In this paper, I provide a review of data approaches that address the class imbalance problem in EEG classification. I explored methods such as oversampling, undersampling, and the application of advanced algorithms such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), which generally showed better overall performance in dealing with class imbalance. In this paper, I reviewed work published in the last 5 years to evaluate the current state of the art in imbalance. In addition, I provide insight into potential gaps in EEG classification, especially in traumatic brain injury (TBI), and discuss the potential of data augmentation based on deep learning, i.e., GANs, which have shown promise in generating synthetic data to improve minority class representation in other application domains for the EEG-based classification model. By highlighting gaps in existing EEG classification methods and proposing GANs as a solution to class imbalance, I aim to contribute to the development of more robust prediction models that may lead to improved patient outcomes in TBI cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.