Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004566›Full record

ReviewAIMS neuroscience2026

Addressing class imbalance in traumatic brain injury prognostication: A survey of resampling approaches.

Nor Safira Elaina Mohd Noor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIMS neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nor Safira Elaina Mohd NoorDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has attracted considerable interest, particularly in clinical and cognitive neuroscience applications. However, the problem of class imbalance often undermines the performance of classification algorithms and leads to biased predictions in favor of the majority class. In this paper, I provide a review of data approaches that address the class imbalance problem in EEG classification. I explored methods such as oversampling, undersampling, and the application of advanced algorithms such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), which generally showed better overall performance in dealing with class imbalance. In this paper, I reviewed work published in the last 5 years to evaluate the current state of the art in imbalance. In addition, I provide insight into potential gaps in EEG classification, especially in traumatic brain injury (TBI), and discuss the potential of data augmentation based on deep learning, i.e., GANs, which have shown promise in generating synthetic data to improve minority class representation in other application domains for the EEG-based classification model. By highlighting gaps in existing EEG classification methods and proposing GANs as a solution to class imbalance, I aim to contribute to the development of more robust prediction models that may lead to improved patient outcomes in TBI cases.

Indexed as

electroencephalogramgenerative adversarial networkimbalanceresamplingtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID42004566
PMCPMC13086590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.