Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004486›Full record

ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2026

Unmet need for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer initiating first-line treatment: data from the prospective German tumor registry OPAL.

E Stickeler, T Decker, M-O Zahn, M Thill, M Zaiss, A Nusch, C Teutsch, M Wang, A Kuske, K Ringwald and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

E StickelerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
T DeckerMVZ für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Ravensburg, Germany.
M-O ZahnMVZ Onkologische Kooperation Harz, Goslar, Germany.
M ThillKlinik für Gynäkologie und gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
M ZaissPraxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie & Hämatologie, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
A NuschPraxis für Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie, Ratingen, Germany.
C TeutschFrauenklinik und Brustzentrum, Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
M WangEpidemiology and Real-World Evidence, Gilead Sciences Europe, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UK.
A KuskeMedical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, München, Germany.
K RingwaldBiostatistics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
L KruggelClinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
N HarbeckBrustzentrum, Frauenklinik, LMU Klinikum München, München, Germany.
A WöckelFrauenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
A WeltInnere Klinik Tumorforschung, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
K GratzkeMedical Department, iOMEDICO, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
OPAL registry group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The treatment landscape for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) has evolved. However, data on implementation of novel treatment approaches in clinical routine and current real-world outcomes are limited. Patients and methods: Patients with mTNBC who initiated first-line (1L) treatment between January 2018 and August 2023 were prospectively observed within the OPAL registry. Treatment patterns, median real-world overall survival (rwOS), and progression-free survival (rwPFS) were analyzed by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Results: Among 368 patients included in this analysis, 31.8% were PD-L1 positive, 35.9% PD-L1 negative, and 32.3% PD-L1 unknown. Median age was 62.0 years, 10.6% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, and 37.8% had Conclusions: Although new treatment options have been rapidly integrated into clinical routine, chemotherapy remains standard for most patients in 1L. Survival remains poor, with at least one-quarter dying without reaching 2L. This highlights the need for novel therapies to improve mTNBC outcomes.

Indexed as

clinical outcomefirst-line therapyPD-L1 statusreal-world datatreatment patternstriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID42004486
PMCPMC13091147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.