ReviewDigital health
Digital art therapy for emotional well-being in adults with cancer: A scoping review of digital health interventions.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emotional distress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms are highly prevalent among adults with cancer. Digital art therapy (DAT), encompassing immersive, musical, visual, and narrative digital modalities, has emerged as a potential approach to expand access to creative psychosocial interventions; however, the evidence base remains fragmented and methodologically heterogeneous. Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the characteristics, digital design features, and reported psychosocial outcomes of DAT interventions targeting anxiety and depression in adults with cancer. Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework. Electronic databases were searched through August 2025 for studies evaluating digitally delivered art-based interventions in adult oncology populations. Data on intervention modality, study design, sample size, outcome measures, effect estimates, and feasibility indicators were extracted and synthesized descriptively. Results: Ten studies (2016-2025; N = 434) were included, comprising randomized controlled trials (n = 6), quasi-experimental studies (n = 1), mixed-methods studies (n = 1), and qualitative or developmental studies (n = 2). Interventions included immersive virtual reality, digital music therapy, online visual art programs, and digital storytelling. Most studies were early-phase with small to moderate samples and short follow-up. Reported reductions in anxiety and distress ranged from small to very large (Cohen's d ≈ 0.24-2.38; η Conclusions: DAT appears feasible and acceptable, with preliminary evidence of psychosocial benefit. However, effect magnitudes are context-dependent, and adequately powered randomized trials with longer-term follow-up are needed to clarify clinical effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.