Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004475›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Motivations and deterrents for posting and responding to online self-harm content: A qualitative survey study.

Laura Kennedy, Anna Lavis, Rachel Winter, Ian Marsh, Dafni Katsampa, Ciara Harris, Lydia Grace, Lisa Marzano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura KennedySamaritans, Surrey, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6420-1205
Anna LavisDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1080-2512
Rachel WinterDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ian MarshFaculty of Medicine, Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-4724
Dafni KatsampaSamaritans, Surrey, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7254-1653
Ciara HarrisWarwick Applied Health, University of Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8985-1359
Lydia GraceSamaritans, Surrey, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-4120
Lisa MarzanoDepartment of Psychology, Middlesex University, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9735-3512

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Self-harm is a major public health concern, and the internet presents challenges and opportunities for prevention. Understanding experiences of engaging with self-harm content is critical for improving online safety. However, existing research has primarily focused on adolescents, and there is a need to examine whether established findings extend across the life course. Objective: This study aimed to explore user motivations and deterrents for posting and responding to online self-harm content among both adults and adolescents. Methods: We analysed qualitative data from a national online survey of UK-based participants aged 16 to 65+ ( Results: Motivations for posting self-harm content were complex and multifaceted, with social and intrapersonal functions evident across both adolescents and adults. Seeking help and support from others was the most common motivation for posting, while venting negative emotions was described more frequently by adolescents. Concern about triggering others was the most common deterrent to posting. Responding to self-harm content was primarily motivated by a desire to support others, particularly among adults, although some younger users were driven by a desire to exert corrective action. The main reason for not responding to self-harm content was a felt lack of emotional capacity to engage with this material. Conclusions: This study extends existing research by demonstrating that common motivations and deterrents for engaging with online self-harm content are evident beyond adolescence and across the life course. Findings highlight the importance of age-inclusive user education initiatives and practitioner assessments, and caution against blanket restrictions on self-harm content that may unintentionally limit access to peer support.

Indexed as

onlineself-harmsocial mediasuicideuser experiences

Identifiers

PMID42004475
PMCPMC13087370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.