Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004460›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2026

Readmission rates after intraoperative durotomy and repair in outpatient lumbar spinal surgery.

Joshua D Proal, Andrew S Moon, Kristen LaHaise, James J Taylor, Brian Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua D ProalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, United States.
Andrew S MoonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111, United States.
Kristen LaHaiseDepartment of Research, New England Baptist Hospital, 125 Parker Hill Ave, Boston, MA 02111, United States.
James J TaylorDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, 125 Parker Hill Ave, Boston, MA 02111, United States.
Brian KwonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, 125 Parker Hill Ave, Boston, MA 02111, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative management following durotomy and subsequent repair typically involves inpatient admission for at least 24 hours. Spinal headaches are the principal symptom signifying ongoing CSF leak and require monitored activity restriction. More recently, patients are being discharged same-day following durotomy repair. The goal of this study was to assess the risk of readmission after same-day discharge following intraoperative durotomy and repair. Methods: In this retrospective review, 273 instances of durotomy and subsequent primary repair were identified out of 3,391 patients that underwent lumbar spine surgery at a single center between October 2012 and September 2017 were identified. Out of the 273 cases, 111 (40.7%) were planned as ambulatory day surgery. Fifty-two patients (46.8%) were discharged home as planned, while 59 (53.2%) were admitted postoperatively. Following the surgical encounter, patients that were readmitted within 30 days due to durotomy-related symptoms were identified. Relative risk ratios for readmission were assessed between patients who were discharged same-day versus admitted postoperatively. Results: Of the 52 patients discharged home same day, 2 were readmitted (3.8%); of the 59 patients admitted postoperatively, 5 were readmitted (8.5%). No dural tears required return to OR for management of complications, and there was an overall durotomy rate of 8.1%. Compared to patients discharged home same-day, patients admitted after durotomy repair were: older (p=.001), had a diagnosis of stenosis (vs herniated nucleus pulposus) (p=.004), had a laminectomy (vs a microdiscectomy) (p=.007), had surgery Monday-Thursday (p=.004), and had surgery by a lower volume surgeon (p=.016). The relative risk of readmission in patients admitted at the time of index procedure was not statistically different compared with those discharged the same-day as planned (RR: 2.20, 95% CI: 0.45,10.88). Conclusion: In patients undergoing outpatient spine procedures, discharge home after intraoperative durotomy and repair may not confer an increased risk of readmission. One factor that was not examined was subjective assessment of repair quality, which may imply more significant CSF leak, thus leading to admission. We believe this data suggests that postoperative course following durotomy repair may have similar outcomes - specifically readmission - whether or not a patient is admitted. This data may also influence direct cost savings due to decreased length of stay.

Indexed as

CSF LeakDurotomyHerniated nucleus pulposusLumbar Spine SurgeryPostoperative DischargeReadmission RateSpinal Stenosis

Identifiers

PMID42004460
PMCPMC13091319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.