Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004443›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026

Economic benefit of expanding mammography screening for breast cancer in Colombia: A cost modelling analysis.

Ana María Osorio, Daniel Samacá-Samacá, Melissa Diaz-Puentes, Ana María Ramos, Laura Prieto-Pinto, María Alejandra Bravo, Sergio Cervera-Bonilla, José Joaquín Caicedo, Sebastián Quintero, Jorge Ceballos and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ana María OsorioBreast Cancer Unit, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center - CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia.
Daniel Samacá-SamacáEvidence Generation, Roche, Bogotá, Colombia.
Melissa Diaz-PuentesEvidence Generation, Roche, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ana María RamosEvidence Generation, Roche, Bogotá, Colombia.
Laura Prieto-PintoEvidence Generation, Roche, Bogotá, Colombia.
María Alejandra BravoBreast Cancer Unit, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center - CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia.
Sergio Cervera-BonillaBreast Cancer Unit, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center - CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia.
José Joaquín CaicedoBreast Cancer Unit, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center - CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia.
Sebastián QuinteroBreast Cancer Unit, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center - CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jorge CeballosBusiness Intelligence Unit, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center - CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia.
Natalia SánchezGIGA Research Group, CTIC/Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juliana SaavedraMedical Department, Roche, Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrés F CardonaGIGA Research Group, CTIC/Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
William MantillaBreast Cancer Unit, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center - CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia.
Sandra FrancoBreast Cancer Unit, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center - CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Breast cancer (BC) remains a leading cause of mortality, especially when diagnosed at advanced or metastatic stages. Early detection improves survival and reduces treatment costs. This study estimates the economic implications of expanding mammography screening coverage on breast cancer care in Colombia by modelling stage redistribution and associated direct medical treatment costs. Study design: This is a cost-benefit study to evaluate the impact of breast cancer screening strategies on the cost of care in Colombia. Methods: A 5-year Markov model estimated costs by cancer phenotype and clinical stage, utilising healthcare resource utilization data from a comprehensive Colombian cancer center. We compared current costs (31% mammography coverage) with projected costs, assuming a 70% screening rate (using the Netherlands' distribution as a reference). Results: Data from 284 Colombian BC patients were included: Luminal (59%), HER2+ (26%), and Triple-Negative BC (15%). First-year costs varied widely, ranging from early-stage Luminal (USD 10,309) to metastatic HER2+ (USD 60,612). Advanced BC significantly drove healthcare costs. By increasing screening coverage to 70%, the number of early-stage cases detected each year would increase by 56% compared to the current 33%. Increasing screening could shift diagnoses earlier, reducing the average 5-year cost per patient from $68,183 to $58,542. This would translate to a USD 164 million saving for Colombia. Conclusions: Increasing screening coverage improves patient outcomes by detecting more early-stage cases and significantly reduces healthcare expenditures by decreasing costly advanced-stage diagnoses, yielding substantial savings for the Colombian health system.

Identifiers

PMID42004443
PMCPMC13087799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.