Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004439›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2026

Exposure to topiramate may not increase the risk of urolithiasis: A nationwide cohort study.

Kimoon Chang, Woo-Seok Ha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kimoon ChangDepartment of Neurology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, the Republic of Korea.
Woo-Seok HaDepartment of Neurology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Although topiramate is mechanistically linked to an increased risk of urolithiasis, real-world evidence remains conflicting. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of a first-time episode of urolithiasis associated with topiramate exposure in the Korean population. Methods: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort, we identified participants from the 2015 national health screening. After excluding individuals with a prior diagnosis of urolithiasis, we performed 1:4 propensity score matching between patients with and without topiramate exposure. Matching variables included age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, and a history of gout. Participants were followed longitudinally, and the risk of urolithiasis was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: The final cohort included 1,560 patients exposed to topiramate and 6,240 matched controls who were followed for five years. During the follow-up period, urolithiasis was diagnosed in 47 patients (3.0%) in the topiramate group and 170 patients (2.7%) in the control group. The risk of developing urolithiasis was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.545). Furthermore, subgroup analyses stratified by current use or the cumulative duration of topiramate exposure also showed no significant associations. Conclusions: In this large, nationwide cohort, topiramate exposure was not associated with an increased risk of urolithiasis. Our findings suggest that in a real-world setting, the risk may not be as significant as suggested by its pharmacological mechanism.

Indexed as

Carbonic anhydrase inhibitorsEpilepsyMigraine disordersTopiramateUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID42004439
PMCPMC13085087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.