Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004435›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

General anesthesia vs. conscious sedation for endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: a secondary analysis of the ATTENTION trial.

Bin Han, Raynald, Muhammad Firdaus, Yaxin Wu, Ganghua Feng, Xuehan Liu, Peng Zhang, Pengyu Lu, Yi Liu, Wei Hu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bin Han *Shanxi Key Laboratory of Brain Disease Control, Department of Neurology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Raynald *Department of Neuroscience, Dharmais Cancer Hospital - National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Muhammad FirdausDepartment of Neuroscience, Dharmais Cancer Hospital - National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Yaxin WuShanxi Key Laboratory of Brain Disease Control, Department of Neurology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Ganghua FengDepartment of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou First People's Hospital, Institute of Neuromedicine, Chenzhou, China.
Xuehan LiuDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Peng ZhangShanxi Key Laboratory of Brain Disease Control, Department of Neurology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Pengyu LuShanxi Key Laboratory of Brain Disease Control, Department of Neurology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Yi LiuShanxi Key Laboratory of Brain Disease Control, Department of Neurology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Wei HuDivision of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Yaxuan SunShanxi Key Laboratory of Brain Disease Control, Department of Neurology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) performed under general anesthesia (GA) versus conscious sedation (CS) in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (aBAO). Methods: Patients were stratified into GA and CS group. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to balanced baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was a favorable functional outcome, defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mRS 0-1 and 0-3, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at 24 and 72 h, successful recanalization, puncture-to-recanalization time, and safety outcomes, including any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and 90-day mortality. Results: After propensity score matching, there was no significant between the GA and CS groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97, 95% CI, 0.52-1.84; Conclusion: In patients with aBAO undergoing EVT, CS was associated with clinical and safety outcomes comparable to those observed with GA. However, given the modest sample size and limited statistical power, these findings should be interpreted cautiously.

Indexed as

acute basilar artery occlusionanesthetic managementendovascular treatmentoutcomessafety and efficacy

Identifiers

PMID42004435
PMCPMC13082959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.