Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004431›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

Swallowing performance during cognitive tasks in healthy adults.

Xiuen Chen, Chenchen Zhang, Wenhui Shi, Zhichao Ning, Jiejiao Zheng, Yongjun Zheng, Yunyun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiuen Chen *Department of Rehabilitation, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chenchen Zhang *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai Fourth Rehabilitation Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Wenhui Shi *Department of Rehabilitation, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhichao Ning *Department of Rehabilitation, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiejiao ZhengDepartment of Rehabilitation, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yongjun ZhengDepartment of Rehabilitation, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yunyun ZhangDepartment of Internal Neurology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Dysphagia frequently co-occurs with cognitive impairment, suggesting that swallowing may involve cognitive processes. However, the relationship between cognitive load and swallowing performance remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the effects of different levels of cognitive load on swallowing performance under dual-task conditions in healthy adults. Methods: Forty-three graduate students (mean age: 24.49 ± 1.63 years, male/female: 22/21) were recruited and performed five tasks: swallowing single task (SST), low-load cognitive single task (ST Results: Swallowing volume differed significantly among SST, DT Conclusion: The findings confirm that swallowing engages executive function and attentional resources, and suggest that participants prioritize swallowing performance during dual-task conditions by adjusting prefrontal activation patterns rather than increasing overall cortical activation to manage interference. This study provides preliminary evidence for the cognitive involvement in swallowing and highlights the need to consider cognitive load in dysphagia assessment and rehabilitation.

Indexed as

cognitiondual taskexecutive functionhealthy adultsswallowing

Identifiers

PMID42004431
PMCPMC13082936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.