ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Advancing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration (Nerve SPACE 2025).
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injuries remain a major clinical challenge due to slow axonal regeneration, rapid Wallerian degeneration (WD), and degeneration of target organs prior to reinnervation. Where are we now?: Strategies to enhance regeneration can be broadly divided into three categories: preventing or delaying WD, speeding up axonal regeneration, and improving the molecular environment at the injury site. Approaches to delay WD include polyethylene glycol-mediated axonal fusion, which may restore early axonal continuity and conduction, and inhibition of sterile alpha and TIR motif-containing 1, the central executioner of WD, with small-molecule inhibitors now in clinical trials. Methods to accelerate axon regrowth include brief intraoperative electrical stimulation, which activates regeneration-associated gene programs and improves motor and sensory recovery in both preclinical and early clinical studies, and pharmacologic augmentation with 4-aminopyridine, which enhances conduction across demyelinated fibers and promotes remyelination. Where do we need to go?: Optimizing the local microenvironment through cellular and molecular adjuncts, including mesenchymal stem cells, Schwann cells, exosomes, surgical angiogenesis, and local delivery of neuroregenerative drugs such as FK506, has also shown promise in experimental models. Across all approaches, progress is hindered by heterogeneous outcome measures, a lack of standardized protocols, and barriers to multicenter collaboration. How do we get there?: Coordinated efforts among academia, industry, and regulatory agencies are needed to standardize methodologies, develop objective outcome measures, and enable well-structured multicenter clinical trials to achieve meaningful clinical translation. Ultimately, meaningful functional recovery will depend on integrating complementary approaches and bridging gaps in mechanistic understanding, delivery systems, and trial design, creating the synergy needed to translate promising therapies from bench to bedside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.