Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004396›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2026

Lung cancer screening knowledge, opinions and attitudes among healthcare professionals in Estonia prior to national program initiation.

Kadi Kallavus, Tanel Laisaar, Kaja-Triin Laisaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kadi KallavusInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-4327
Tanel LaisaarInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7763-4720
Kaja-Triin LaisaarInstitute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-9601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to gain insight into the opinions and attitudes about, and potential barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening (LCS) among healthcare professionals in Estonia. It also aimed to determine knowledge gaps that could be addressed when planning next steps toward a national LCS program. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted in June to August 2023 among primary care providers (PCPs), pulmonologists, radiologists, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons in Estonia. Differences between PCPs and other specialists were analyzed with regard to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes toward LCS. Results: About 146 healthcare professionals responded, 57% were family physicians. Less than half of all respondents considered existing evidence or international recommendations sufficient to support national LCS implementation, with uncertainty higher among PCPs. Adjusted analyses revealed that the PCPs had substantially higher odds of responding "Do not know" concerning international recommendations (aOR 5.06; 95% CI 1.97-13.85), and were far less likely to agree to assigning main responsibility for LCS participation to family physicians (aOR 0.10; 95% CI 0.02-0.40). PCPs also demonstrated greater uncertainty about the costs and labor intensity in LCS. Conclusion: This study reveals substantial variation in LCS knowledge, attitudes, and certainty across healthcare profession(al)s, highlighting the need for targeted training. Although for most professionals the benefits of LCS outweigh potential harms, structural constraints and uncertainty should still be carefully considered. Despite limited generalizability, study findings support evidence-informed planning and have already been considered in the Estonian LCS pilot study, the first step toward a national LCS program.

Indexed as

healthcare professionalsknowledge and attitudeslung cancer screeningprimary care providersscreening implementation

Identifiers

PMID42004396
PMCPMC13084024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.