ArticleJournal of public health research2026
Beyond the standard: Rethinking Likert scale use in measuring patient satisfaction at public health center in Indonesia.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient satisfaction surveys in Indonesian public health centers use a four-point Likert scale mandated by the Regulation of the Minister of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform (PERMENPAN-RB), which may restrict sensitivity and accuracy. Internationally, broader Likert scales commonly five or seven-point-are widely used to obtain more nuanced responses and have been shown to improve reliability, validity, and cross-cultural comparability of patient-reported outcomes. Aligning Indonesian practices with these standards enhances measurement precision and facilitates benchmarking against global indicators. Accurate measurement of patient satisfaction is critical for benchmarking health service quality worldwide. This study aimed to develop a predictive model that generates scores on a seven-point Likert scale based on responses originally measured using a four-point format. Design and Method: This cross-sectional study surveyed 200 outpatients from 2 Public Health Centers (Puskesmas) in Padang City, measuring satisfaction with four- and seven-point Likert scales simultaneously. Regression analysis developed a predictive model converting four-point scores into seven-point equivalents. Results: The seven-point scale produced higher satisfaction and performance scores. A strong correlation ( Conclusion: The seven-point scale provides a more accurate measure of patient satisfaction. The regression model enables conversion of existing four-point data, supporting more precise assessment of patient satisfaction and service quality, and informing evaluation and policy decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.