Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004310›Full record

ReviewAIMS public health2026

Mental health nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward clozapine management protocols challenges and implications for clinical practice: A narrative review.

Polyxeni Mangoulia, Maria Topi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIMS public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Polyxeni MangouliaLaboratory Nursing Counseling Support and Psychoeducation of Patients with Mental Illness and Caregivers, Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Maria TopiEginitio Hospital, 1st Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic primarily used in cases of treatment-resistant schizophrenia, showing significant clinical efficacy. However, a major challenge in its administration is the requirement for systematic monitoring, which necessitates nurses to possess documented knowledge and skills. In this study, we aimed to synthesize nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward clozapine administration protocols and the importance of education for ensuring safe clinical practice. A literature review spanning the past decade was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases, focusing on English terms related to nurses' understanding of clozapine administration protocols and the associated needs and implications in clinical settings to construct a comprehensive narrative review on this subject matter. Findings revealed that approximately half the nurses surveyed reported inadequate knowledge regarding the side effects of clozapine, leading to significant implications for patient monitoring, treatment, and medication adherence. Nurses with higher levels of education exhibited greater knowledge levels. Factors such as lower education levels, limited clinical experience, high workload, fatigue, and blind adherence to medical instructions were found to influence nurses' knowledge and attitudes. Training programs were shown to reduce stress, enhance nurses' knowledge and confidence, and foster trust in patient care. Nurses were identified as playing a crucial role in the safe administration of clozapine, both within hospital settings and in the community. Education was highlighted as a key factor in improving knowledge levels and shifting attitudes among nurses and patients toward the safe use of clozapine.

Indexed as

administration protocolsattitudesclozapineknowledgemental health nursesnursesside effects

Identifiers

PMID42004310
PMCPMC13084421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.