Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004302›Full record

ArticleAIMS public health2026

Evaluating the impact of a tobacco tax increase on smoking cessation outcomes: A seven-year retrospective study from a regional teaching hospital in Taiwan.

Po-Hsun Yang, Yuan-Shan Chien, Dih-Ling Luh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIMS public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Po-Hsun YangThe Department of Public Health, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yuan-Shan ChienThe Department of Public Health, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Dih-Ling LuhThe Department of Public Health, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study assesses the impact of Taiwan's 2017 tobacco tax increase on smoking cessation outcomes using data from a regional teaching hospital between 2013 and 2019. It focuses on the treatment completion rates for pharmacotherapy and health education interventions. Methods: This retrospective study involves a secondary data analysis conducted at a regional teaching hospital. The analysis included preventive healthcare and smoking cessation service records from the National Health Insurance Administration database and the hospital's own records. The effectiveness of smoking cessation programs was assessed via follow-up records at three and six months, which were categorized into four groups: failure (smoking-smoking), relapse (not smoking-smoking), delay (smoking-not smoking), and successful cessation (not smoking-not smoking). A multinomial logistic regression model was applied for the multivariate analysis. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in the effectiveness of smoking cessation services before and after the tobacco tax increase. However, the participants who failed to complete both the pharmacotherapy and the health education counseling had a markedly higher likelihood of cessation failure compared with those who completed both interventions ( Conclusion: While the 2017 tobacco tax increase did not significantly improve cessation outcomes, service completion was strongly associated with success. Efforts to support full participation in smoking cessation services may enhance the treatment's effectiveness.

Indexed as

health education consultationsmoking cessation effectivenesssmoking cessation servicesmoking cessation treatmentTaiwantobacco tax

Identifiers

PMID42004302
PMCPMC13084394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.