ArticleAIMS public health2026
Evaluating the impact of a tobacco tax increase on smoking cessation outcomes: A seven-year retrospective study from a regional teaching hospital in Taiwan.
Article in AIMS public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study assesses the impact of Taiwan's 2017 tobacco tax increase on smoking cessation outcomes using data from a regional teaching hospital between 2013 and 2019. It focuses on the treatment completion rates for pharmacotherapy and health education interventions. Methods: This retrospective study involves a secondary data analysis conducted at a regional teaching hospital. The analysis included preventive healthcare and smoking cessation service records from the National Health Insurance Administration database and the hospital's own records. The effectiveness of smoking cessation programs was assessed via follow-up records at three and six months, which were categorized into four groups: failure (smoking-smoking), relapse (not smoking-smoking), delay (smoking-not smoking), and successful cessation (not smoking-not smoking). A multinomial logistic regression model was applied for the multivariate analysis. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in the effectiveness of smoking cessation services before and after the tobacco tax increase. However, the participants who failed to complete both the pharmacotherapy and the health education counseling had a markedly higher likelihood of cessation failure compared with those who completed both interventions ( Conclusion: While the 2017 tobacco tax increase did not significantly improve cessation outcomes, service completion was strongly associated with success. Efforts to support full participation in smoking cessation services may enhance the treatment's effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.