ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
Nonfacial Use of Injectable Poly-L-lactic Acid: Safety Data From a Multicenter Observational Study in the United States.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA-SCA) was approved for facial aesthetic use in the USA in 2009. Nonfacial aesthetic treatment using PLLA-SCA, a collagen-stimulating injectable implant, is a frequent clinical practice, and initial studies support its safety. Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of PLLA-SCA when used in nonfacial areas in real clinical practice in the USA. Methods: In this retrospective chart review, subjects treated in a nonfacial area with ≥2 vials of PLLA-SCA in ≥2 treatment sessions were eligible. Medical charts from 9 US sites were reviewed to collect demographics, treatment details, and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was treatment-related AEs. Results: Among the 498 subjects included, most subjects (72%) had 2 or 3 treatment sessions, with an average of 4.0 vials/treatment session. Reconstitution volumes were generally ≥10 mL/vial for all treatment areas, with 47% of treatments using volumes of 10-15 mL, and another 47% using ≥15 mL/vial. The most common treatment area was the gluteal region (buttocks or hip dip; 60.3% of sessions) and decolletage (8.2% of sessions). Most treatment-related AEs were injection related and mild or moderate in intensity. The most common AE was injection site bruising (5.0%), and AEs were mainly reported in the buttocks (4.0%) or posterior thigh (1.0%). Nodule occurrence was low (1 subject, 0.2%). Conclusions: Poly-L-lactic acid was well tolerated in real-world use for treatment of a range of nonfacial areas, with typically larger volumes than usually used for facial treatment. Level of Evidence 3 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.