ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2026
Chinese Patent Medicines for Cervical Spondylosis: A Comprehensive Review and Current Status of Clinical Research.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, an overview review method was employed to systematically categorize proprietary Chinese patent medicines (CPM) for cervical spondylosis listed in the national authoritative drug catalogues and assess their current clinical research status. Literature management and data extraction were performed by searching the databases (updated until January 26, 2025) using EndNote and Excel, and the results were presented visually. A total of 31 proprietary CPMs were included in the study, with activation of blood circulation and removal of blood stasis being the most common therapeutic effects. Involving 112 medicinal ingredients, Pueraria lobata Radix is the most commonly used Chinese medicine ingredient. A total of 130 articles were screened from the literature, with the highest number of studies focusing on Jingtong granules (tablets) (24.62%). The number of studies peaked in 2023, with 77.69% of the studies being randomized controlled trials. Among these, 126 were clinical trial studies, with a maximum sample size of 528 participants. The most common intervention regimen involved CPM combined with western medicines versus western medicines alone (17.46%). The intervention duration was 4 weeks (25.40%), with the main outcome measure being the "Total Effective Rate (TER)" (86.51%). This study demonstrates that CPM has strong potential for treating cervical spondylosis. However, issues remain, such as incomplete information in some drug instructions and the lack of standardization in clinical studies, which require further improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.