Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004213›Full record

ArticlePublic health challenges2026

Implementing a Co-Produced Women's Health Programme in an Integrated Care System.

Susan Conquer, Lizzie Mapplebeck, Annetta Bradshaw, Lisa Nobes, Camille Cronin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan ConquerUniversity of Suffolk & Suffolk and North East Essex ICB Suffolk UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2044-7427
Lizzie MapplebeckSuffolk and North East Essex ICB Suffolk UK.
Annetta BradshawHealthwatch Suffolk Suffolk UK.
Lisa NobesSuffolk and North East Essex ICB Suffolk UK.
Camille CroninSchool of Health and Social Care University of Essex Colchester Essex UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8331-099X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Co-production is a key principle of the Women's Health Strategy for England, yet there are limited published examples of its application at system level. This article describes the development of a co-produced women's health programme within an integrated care system in England. Methods: A service improvement approach was used, involving a multidisciplinary advisory group of over 160 members, including people with lived experience. The group co-designed methods to identify local priorities and support programme development. Results: A survey of 1238 respondents identified gaps in access to and integration of women's health services. These findings informed the design and implementation of five prioritised women's health service models, each with defined objectives and built-in evaluation to support quality and sustainability. Discussion: This study demonstrates how community co-production can inform the design of locally responsive women's health services. Integrating lived experience with professional expertise supported equitable service development, though challenges included limited long-term funding and sustaining broad engagement. Conclusion: System-level co-production can support the development of women's health programmes aligned with national strategy. This model illustrates a co-production approach that may inform the development of women's health services in other local settings. Patient and Public Contribution: People with lived experience of women's health services were involved throughout, including identifying priorities, co-designing solutions and shaping programme development.

Indexed as

co‐designcommunity engagementco‐productionpublic patient involvement and engagementservice improvementwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID42004213
PMCPMC13088274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.