ArticleJTCVS techniques2025
Implementation of
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Methods: Targeted SA screening and decolonization started at our institution in November 2022. To assess barriers and facilitators to implementation, we conducted focus group interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research at approximately 6 months after initiation of the intervention. We also regularly collected quantitative data on missed screening and/or decolonization to address gaps in uptake. This was reviewed at 6-month and 1-year time points. Adjustments to implementation were regularly made to address barriers. Results: At 1 year, 563 nonurgent inpatients and 232 outpatients were consulted to cardiac surgery. Ninety-five percent of the inpatients and 91% of the outpatients considered for cardiac surgery were screened appropriately. Of the patients accepted for cardiac surgery, 50% of positive inpatients underwent decolonization in the first 6 months prior to focus groups compared to 67% in the subsequent 6 months. For outpatients, 77% were decolonized in the first 6 months, compared to 79% in the subsequent 6 months. Major barriers to implementation included delays in receiving screening results, difficulty meeting screening and decolonization timelines, and staffing turnover. Conclusions: SA screening and decolonization was successfully implemented as a standard of care at our institution with the aid of an implementation science framework. By engaging care partners and healthcare staff throughout the implementation process and regularly addressing barriers, we developed a sustainable SA screening and decolonization program. Adjustments are ongoing to increase and sustain decolonization uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.