Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004209›Full record

ArticleEnvironment and planning. C, Politics and space2025

From embracement to attachment: Registering people on the move and the couplings of noncitizenship and territory.

Paul Trauttmansdorff, Annalisa Pelizza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment and planning. C, Politics and space, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul TrauttmansdorffTechnical University of Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1826-6750
Annalisa PelizzaUniversity of Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7720-5659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article analyzes how people on the move encounter registration infrastructures on their journey to Europe. Through the lens of three empirical cases-registration in the Eurodac system, registration in the framework of the European temporary protection directive, and national registration of migrants on Hellenic islands-we explore what we term "noncitizenship-territory couplings." The article develops the concept of "registration as attachment" to describe how sociotechnical procedures establish relationships between noncitizen subjects, mobility rights, and territorial space. We therefore ask how registration infrastructures couple territory and noncitizenship in Europe in different ways-that is, how such couplings shape the movement of people, enact territories, and endow spatial rights or restrictions. We argue that new and partial couplings of noncitizenship and territory are produced-the "containment coupling," the "facilitation coupling," and the "detainment coupling." Each follows specific registration dynamics, enacts different territorial patterns, and simultaneously shapes migrant mobility and their rights. By situating the article at the intersection of science and technology studies, human geography, and citizenship studies, we wish to contribute to the growing literature on the performative effects of infrastructures in border and migration governance. At the same time, our intervention encourages further analysis of the varied spatialities of states and sovereign power that move beyond current discussions about denationalization and deterritorialization.

Indexed as

attachmentborder databases(non)citizenshipRegistration infrastructuresterritories

Identifiers

PMID42004209
PMCPMC13086290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.