Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004175›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2025

Identification of Viral Variants from Functional Genomics Data.

Florian Röckl, Caroline C Friedel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Florian RöcklInstitute for Informatics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen (LMU), Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Caroline C FriedelInstitute for Informatics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen (LMU), Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3569-4877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Virus mutants are commonly used for studying the role of individual viral proteins in infections and are increasingly investigated with functional genomics experiments of infected cells that use sequencing-based assays such as RNA-seq or ATAC-seq. However, existing mutant virus strains are often poorly documented, in particular if they have been created decades ago. Identifying viral variants directly in the functional genomics experiments avoids additional genome sequencing and allows confirming the presence of specific mutations directly in the experiment of interest. Methods: We present a pipeline to directly identify mutations in viral genomes from sequencing-based functional genomics data. The pipeline combines existing SNP callers with novel methods for identifying deletions, insertions, and corresponding inserted sequences. These novel methods address the problem that existing structural variant callers performed poorly on functional genomics data with large variations in read coverage. Results: We evaluated the pipeline on RNA-seq data for infection with knockout mutants for important proteins of Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1). Comparison of the variants identified by our pipeline with the descriptions of the original publications showed that we could correctly recover the introduced mutations. Conclusions: Our pipeline offers researchers a fast and easy way to identify variants in the viral genome without additional genome sequencing. The pipeline is implemented as a workflow for the workflow management system Watchdog and is available at https://github.com/watchdog-wms/watchdog-wms-workflows/ (workflow VariantCallerPipeline).

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, ViralGenomicsHerpesvirus 1, HumanHumansMutationPolymorphism, Single Nucleotidefunctional genomics datanull mutant virusvariant calling pipelinevirus infections

Identifiers

PMID42004175
PMCPMC13090762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.