Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004168›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging2026

Multimodal frailty detection in primary care using a portable sensor-based platform: exploratory results.

Florian Legrand, Ioannis Bargiotas, Matthieu Ndumbi Lukuenya, Jean-Marc Eychene, Evelyne Alastor, Lise Haddouk, Christophe Labourdette, Sébastien Leruste, Jean-Marc Franco, Frédéric Sandron and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Florian Legrand *Institut de Recherche pour le Développement Ceped-UMR 196, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Ioannis Bargiotas *Centre Borelli, UMR 9010, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ENS Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.
Matthieu Ndumbi LukuenyaCentre Borelli, UMR 9010, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ENS Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.
Jean-Marc EycheneCentre Borelli, UMR 9010, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ENS Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.
Evelyne AlastorInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement Ceped-UMR 196, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Lise HaddoukCentre Borelli, UMR 9010, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ENS Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.
Christophe LabourdetteCentre Borelli, UMR 9010, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ENS Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.
Sébastien LerusteUFR Santé, University of La Réunion, Saint-Pierre, France.
Jean-Marc FrancoUFR Santé, University of La Réunion, Saint-Pierre, France.
Frédéric SandronInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement Ceped-UMR 196, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Pierre-Paul VidalCentre Borelli, UMR 9010, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, ENS Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Frailty reflects age-related decline across multiple physiological systems, reducing resilience and increasing risks of falls, hospitalization, disability, and mortality. Scalable approaches are needed to identify pre-frailty earlier in community-dwelling older adults and enable timely prevention in primary care. Objective: To develop and evaluate a multivariable sensor-based framework for early frailty detection using standardized gait and balance assessments in general practice. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study (2021-2024) in southern Réunion Island among retired adults aged ≥65 years recruited in primary care. The protocol included: (1) baseline general practitioner (GP) assessment with expert frailty rating, Fried phenotype, and WHO ICOPE Step 1; (2) telephone assessment of mental health, self-rated health, and quality of life; (3) outpatient instrumented evaluation combining IMU-based gait analysis, force-platform posturography, grip strength, and ICOPE Step 2 measures; (4) monthly falls surveillance over 6 months; and (5) repeat instrumented gait and balance assessment at 6 months. Correlation analyses and machine-learning models examined relationships between frailty measures and the discriminative value of sensor-derived and multimodal predictors. Results: Among 145 participants (mean age 71 ± 5 years), 98.5% had impairment in at least one intrinsic capacity domain at baseline, most commonly vision (77.7%), locomotion (53.1%), hearing (52.5%), and psychological (27.3%). Sedentary behavior was frequent (77%). Expert frailty scores correlated with the Fried phenotype, whereas associations with self-rated health were weaker. Models based on sensor parameters alone showed limited ability to reproduce Fried-defined frailty, while multimodal models integrating clinical and questionnaire variables improved discrimination. Over 6 months, kinesiotherapy and regular physical activity were associated with improved postural control metrics (including center-of-pressure features and mediolateral sway), while changes in gait speed were modest. Conclusion: An IoT-supported platform combining quantitative gait, balance, and grip strength measures with targeted questionnaires is feasible in outpatient primary care and yields frailty estimates broadly consistent with GP assessment. However, subjective and clinical inputs remain essential to capture psychological aspects of frailty not fully reflected by sensor signals alone. These findings support scalable frailty screening and longitudinal monitoring, and warrant validation in larger samples, including deployment by trained non-medical personnel and integration into precision-prevention pathways.

Indexed as

digital healthfall riskfrailtygait analysisICOPEpostural balanceprimary care

Identifiers

PMID42004168
PMCPMC13083077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.