Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004091›Full record

ReviewVeterinary evidence

Ideal time to replace isotonic crystalloid intravenous fluids and sets.

Erik Fausak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary evidence. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge Summary Update: This paper is an update to 'Can I Hang? Ideal Time to Replace Isotonic Crystalloid Intravenous Fluids and Sets to Prevent Fluid Contamination and Blood Stream Infection: a Knowledge Summary' by Fausak et al. (2016).Please click the link to view the original paper: https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v1i4.47. PICO question: In dogs and cats does the changing of IV fluids every 96 hours, compared to longer durations, reduce the risk of contamination in the bag? Clinical bottom line: Category of research: Incidence. Number and type of study designs reviewed: Two prospective studies and a Cochrane systematic review for human patients. Strength of evidence: Weak. Outcomes reported: There was some consistency between the human systematic review and clinical experimental design in the veterinary intensive care unit (ICU). Another experimental study created some heterogeneity in results, where fluids were not contaminated for a long time (60 days), but two factors limit this study's external validity, it was conducted in a clean laboratory environment and ports were wiped with alcohol before culturing samples. Both veterinary studies are limited as they only explored intravenous (IV) fluid bags which had no additives and were not connected to live animals or IV sets. Conclusion: Based on two prospective veterinary experiments and one human Systematic Review (meta-analysis), fluid bags and IV sets should be changed every 72-96 hours. Additionally, supportive evidence suggests that environmental cleanliness and creating a routine of wiping ports with alcohol prior to injection or withdrawal may significantly decrease the likelihood of fluid contamination. This certainly seems to be an area that needs more experimental studies with a low risk of bias on clinical patients.

Indexed as

HANG TIMEIV FLUIDSIV SETSREPLACEMENT FLUIDSSMALL ANIMAL

Identifiers

PMID42004091
PMCPMC13011017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.