Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004011›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2026

Traumatic brain injury recovery prediction by harmonizing real brain CT and synthetic brain MRI: a pilot study.

Yiming Che, Amogh Manoj Joshi, Jay Shah, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Siddiquee, Catherine D Chong, Simona Nikolova, Gina Dumkrieger, Baoxin Li, Teresa Wu, Todd J Schwedt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yiming CheSchool of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Amogh Manoj JoshiSchool of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Jay ShahSchool of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3617-2395
Md Mahfuzur Rahman SiddiqueeSchool of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7145-215X
Catherine D ChongASU-Mayo Center for Innovative Imaging, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Simona NikolovaDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Gina DumkriegerDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Baoxin LiSchool of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Teresa WuSchool of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Todd J SchwedtASU-Mayo Center for Innovative Imaging, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To enhance the prediction of traumatic brain injury (mTBI) outcomes, we propose a deep learning approach that integrates brain computed tomography (CT) scans with corresponding synthetic T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T1-MRI). Our method significantly outperforms the prediction using CT scans alone. TRACK-TBI Pilot dataset, which includes imaging and clinical outcome data from patients with TBI, is studied. The hypothesis is brain CT and T1-MRI complement each other and together will improve TBI prognosis compared to using either CT or T1-MRI alone. Since CT and T1-MRI may not be available for the same individual, we employed a specialized version of a generative adversarial network (GAN), known as fixed-point GAN (FP-GAN). FP-GAN was trained using unpaired CT and T1-MRI scans to generate synthetic T1-MRIs from real CT scans. This process produced pseudo-paired CT-MRI data, which was then used to train a deep learning classifier for outcome prediction. The classifier consists of dual parallel 3D ResNet-18 models, each independently processing T1-MRI and CT scans. We used Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) scores at 3 months post-TBI as the measure of patient outcomes. To avoid data leakage, the subjects used in FP-GAN and ResNet-18 model have no overlap. We further divided the paired data, allocating 69 samples for 5-fold cross-validation and 17 samples for testing. Prognostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC),

Indexed as

concussiondata harmonizationdeep learningneuroimagingtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID42004011
PMCPMC13084558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.