ArticleJPRAS open2026
3D printing-guided chest wall reconstruction - a case report and literature review.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large chest wall defects may be challenging to reconstruct and requires consideration of skeletal stabilization. Whilst use of synthetic materials has been described, the risks of infection and implant failure resulting in removal are omnipresent. The vascularized fibula free flap is an autologous alternative. We present the first reported application of 3D-printed patient-matched fibula marking guide to facilitate reconstruction of a large sternal defect with an autologous vascularized fibula free flap. A 56-year-old patient developed paradoxical chest wall movements with chest pain following a partial sternectomy for sternal fibrous dysplasia. The primary defect was reconstructed with a synthetic implant, complicated by infection requiring hardware removal. Cross-sectional imaging confirmed herniation of lung contents through the defect. Virtual surgical planning was undertaken to define the best configuration for available autologous bone options. A single free fibula twice osteotomized and configured into a triangle with 3 segments was chosen to close the defect. A patient-matched fibula marking guide was designed and 3D-printed for intra-operative use, and titanium plates were pre-contoured using a life-sized 3D-printed chest wall model. Surgery proceeded without complications, with reported resolution of symptoms post-operatively. Current literature on 3D printing technology for chest wall reconstruction primarily focuses on synthetic implants rather than autologous tissue transfer. Whilst autologous bone grafting for sternal defects is well described, only three cases have reported the use of vascularized fibular free flap reconstruction. This case demonstrates the feasibility of integrating a 3D-printing workflow in the surgical planning of autologous vascularized sternal reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.