ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Clinically deployable AI to predict objective response to radiotherapy-intensified immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent applications of artificial intelligence in cancer radiotherapy and immunotherapy: current status and future directions.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate whether radiotherapy enhances outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with immune-targeted therapy and to develop an interpretable artificial intelligence model for predicting response. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 238 patients with HCC receiving immune-targeted therapy across three hospitals were included and categorized into an RT group or a no-radiotherapy (No-RT) group according to whether RT was delivered during treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to mitigate baseline imbalance. For objective response rate (ORR) prediction, patients were randomly split (7:3) into training and validation cohorts, and eight AI models were developed and evaluated. Results: ORR was higher in the RT group than in the No-RT group (43.3% vs 28.8%, P = 0.02). RT was associated with longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) both before and after PSM (all P < 0.05). Responders exhibited markedly improved OS and PFS compared with non-responders (both P < 0.001). Among eight models, the multilayer perceptron (MLP) achieved the best discrimination in the validation cohort (AUC-ROC = 0.71). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) highlighted age, tumor size, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and RT status as the dominant contributors. Conclusions: In advanced HCC, adding RT to immune-targeted therapy was associated with improved response and survival. An interpretable MLP model may offer a feasible, clinic-friendly approach to ORR prediction and support individualized immunoradiotherapy decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.