ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2026
Acute Effects of Thoracic-Spinal Elevation via a Novel Bench Press Pad on sEMG and Barbell Kinetics in Resistance-Trained Males.
Article in International journal of exercise science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the acute effects of thoracic-spinal elevation, applied via a novel Bench Press Assist Device (BPAD), on pectoralis major activation and barbell kinetics during submaximal bench pressing. Ten resistance-trained males (23 ± 3 y) completed a randomized, single-blind, crossover trial performing five repetitions at 70 % 1-RM under standard flat bench and BPAD conditions. Bilateral surface electromyography (sEMG) assessed pectoralis major activation, while a linear position transducer recorded mean and peak barbell velocity, concentric power, and range of motion (ROM). Compared with the flat-bench condition, the BPAD produced significant increases in mean and peak velocity, bilateral pectoralis major activation (all p < 0.001), and ROM (p = 0.005). Concentric power rose by approximately 9 % but did not reach statistical significance, likely reflecting the fixed external load and the force-velocity trade-off at submaximal intensities. The observed gains in velocity and muscle activation indicate that thoracic elevation enhances mechanical efficiency and neuromuscular engagement during pressing without altering load demands. By facilitating thoracic extension and scapular retraction, the BPAD may improve length-tension relationships and joint alignment, yielding a smoother bar path and greater bilateral muscle symmetry. These findings highlight posture-focused interventions as a simple means to refine pressing mechanics, increase movement efficiency, and potentially reduce shoulder stress, likely driven by improved scapulothoracic mechanics and neural coordination. Future research should examine chronic adaptations to repeated use of thoracic elevation and its applicability across sexes, training levels, and varied load intensities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.