ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2026
C/EBP-β Mediates the Reversal of Sorafenib Resistance by Tunicamycin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib is a standard-of-care therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, acquired resistance to sorafenib severely compromises its long-term clinical efficacy. This study aimed to investigate whether the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress inducer tunicamycin (TM) could overcome this resistance and to elucidate the central role of the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBP-β) in this process. Methods: We established sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 and Huh7 cell lines to mimic the resistant phenotype. The sensitizing effect of TM was evaluated by assessing proliferation, colony formation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and apoptosis. Therapeutic efficacy was further validated in vivo using subcutaneous and orthotopic xenograft models. Results: We found that TM significantly inhibited the proliferation and clonogenicity of sorafenib-resistant cells. TM treatment upregulated C/EBP-β expression and restored sensitivity to sorafenib. Mechanistically, C/EBP-β overexpression phenocopied the effect of TM, whereas its knockdown attenuated TM-induced sensitization. Furthermore, TM induced a C/EBP-β-dependent increase in intracellular ROS, triggering the intrinsic apoptotic pathway characterized by p53 accumulation, an increased Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, and caspase-3 cleavage. In vivo, the combination of TM and C/EBP-β overexpression exerted potent antitumor effects, reducing tumor volume by approximately 91% relative to the sorafenib-only control group in subcutaneous models. Conclusion: Our study identified C/EBP-β as a key effector of the terminal pro-apoptotic ER stress response. While the direct clinical application of TM is limited by its systemic toxicity, these findings highlight the clinical translational potential of targeting the ER stress-C/EBP-β axis, offering a novel combination therapeutic strategy for patients with acquired sorafenib resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.