ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026
Prognostic significance of carotid intima-media thickness in patients with coronary slow flow: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), a marker of systemic atherosclerosis, has been proposed as a prognostic marker of coronary slow flow (SCF). This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive outcomes of CIMT in SCF patients compared to patients with normal coronary flow (NCF). Methods: This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA and a pre-specified PECOS protocol, systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for observational studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional) comparing CIMT and TIMI frame count (TFC) in SCF versus NCF patients. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality using ROBINS-I and AXIS. A random-effects model estimated mean differences (MD) in CIMT and TFC, with heterogeneity evaluated by the I Results: Eight studies involving 451 SCF patients and 344 NCF controls were included. CIMT was significantly higher in SCF patients (pooled MD -0.14 mm; 95% CI -0.21 to -0.07; I Conclusion: The association of slow coronary flow with increased carotid intima-media thickness supports its role as a marker of systemic subclinical atherosclerosis and highlights CIMT as a potential non-invasive tool for early risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.