Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42003843›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2026

The CAMUS Initiative: A Multiphase, Multicentre International Collaboration to Redefine Risk Stratification, Reporting, and Grading of Surgical Complications in Urology.

Christopher Soliman, Niranjan J Sathianathen, Niall M Corcoran, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Patrick Y Wuethrich, Marc A Furrer, CAMUS Study Group Collaborators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher SolimanDepartment of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Niranjan J SathianathenDepartment of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Niall M CorcoranDepartment of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Nathan LawrentschukDepartment of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Patrick Y WuethrichDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marc A FurrerDepartment of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
CAMUS Study Group Collaborators

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical complications remain a major source of preventable morbidity, mortality, and health care expenditure, but existing frameworks such as the Clavien-Dindo classification and Comprehensive Complication Index are clinician-centred and intervention-focused and fail to capture cumulative patient-centred outcomes. This protocol outlines the Complications After Major and Minor Urological Surgery (CAMUS) initiative, a global, multiphase effort to redefine complication reporting, risk stratification, and outcome measurement in urological surgery. CAMUS aims to address these limitations via an integrated, seven-arm programme combining retrospective and prospective data analysis, consensus development, and digital infrastructure design. Arm 1 has assembled a retrospective data set of 130 034 major urological procedures from 180 centres across 33 countries, the largest of its kind. Arms 2 and 3 have completed Delphi surveys with physicians (

Indexed as

Complication reportingDelphi methodRisk estimationSurgical difficultyUrological surgery

Identifiers

PMID42003843
PMCPMC13090734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.