ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2026
Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients With Metastatic Succinate Dehydrogenase-Deficient Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesSuccinate dehydrogenase-deficient (SDH-deficient) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are characterized by variable disease biology with poor responses to traditional tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The role of surgical intervention has been highly debated.
methodsWe performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of metastatic SDH-deficient GIST patients who underwent complete (CC-0) cytoreductive surgery (CRS) from 2017 to 2023. Pathologic-Peritoneal Cancer Index (P-PCI) and GIST Metastatectomy-Surgical Complexity Score (GM-SCS) were used to quantify complexity. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared time to progression on systemic therapy immediately before CRS (TTP-1L) and second to last line of systemic therapy before CRS (TTP-2L) versus time to recurrence (TTR) after CRS.
resultsNine patients met inclusion criteria. The median age at CRS was 29 years (range: 17-43). Median P-PCI was 13 (IQR: 10-15) and median GM-SCS was 19 (IQR: 16-28). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complication rate was 33.3% (3/9) within 90-days postoperatively. Median TTP-1L was unreached and median TTP-2L was 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.5-unreached), as compared to TTR at 26.1 months (95% CI: 15.2-unreached) post CRS (p ≤ 0.0001).
conclusionsPatients who underwent CC-0 CRS achieved prolonged disease control versus prior systemic therapies, suggesting that CRS may be a management option for highly selected SDH-deficient GIST patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.