ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Contextual Transparency Supports Cognitive Control by Reducing Prefrontal Activation and Enhancing Cue Prioritization in Children.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As children grow older, they engage cognitive control (i.e., goal-directed regulation of attention and actions) with increasing flexibility in response to contextual demands, which stems in part from more efficient processing of contextual cues. The present study investigated the neurocognitive mechanisms through which contextual cue transparency (i.e., the clarity or intuitiveness of task cues) benefits children's performance. Five- to 10-year-old children completed a cued task-switching paradigm in which they switched between color- and shape-matching rules as a function of either transparent or arbitrary task cues, while fNIRS or eye-tracking data were recorded. Relative to arbitrary cues, transparent cues led to improved behavioral performance, reduced lateral prefrontal activation, and a higher frequency of efficient gaze patterns (i.e., fixating the cue before the target). Furthermore, distinct patterns of prefrontal activation were associated with cue transparency and switching demands. Thus, greater cue transparency reduced the neurocognitive resources needed to identify goals and facilitated cue prioritization, but they did not appear to enhance attentional shifting. SUMMARY: Greater contextual cue transparency was associated with more efficient behavior and lower prefrontal activation in 5- to 10-year-olds. Children prioritized visual processing of contextual cues more when cues were transparent than arbitrary. Cue transparency and switching demands did not interact and were associated with distinct prefrontal activation patterns. Cue transparency benefits children's cognitive control through prefrontal cortex engagement reduction and greater cue prioritization, but does not support attentional shifting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.