ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Rational Selection of Minimal Sensor Arrays for Analyte Fingerprinting.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-dimensional, cross-reactive sensor arrays enable powerful chemical fingerprinting, but practical use is often limited by the difficulty of identifying a small, reliable subset of sensors from screening data that contain only a few replicates per analyte. In many experimental settings, collecting large data sets is infeasible, and sensor selection must be performed under conditions of substantial variability and partial overlap between analyte responses. Here, we present a transparent and data-efficient analysis framework that enables rational reduction of sensor arrays using limited experimental data. Rather than relying solely on black-box accuracy metrics, our approach constructs simple, analyte-specific decision regions from measured responses and evaluates how individual sensors contribute to the separation of analytes that are most difficult to distinguish. Sensors are ranked by their contribution to resolving these difficult cases, producing stable and reproducible selections even when replicate numbers are small. An intuitive trade-off curve directly identifies the smallest sensor subset required to reach a desired classification performance. The robustness of the approach is demonstrated using controlled inflation alteration of experimental variability and by application to three independent fluorescence-based sensor libraries. In all cases, we show that only a few selected sensors are sufficient to achieve low classification error while retaining clear, interpretable decision maps that reveal how sensor responses give rise to analyte discrimination. This work provides an open-source, general, platform-agnostic strategy for screening data analysis and sensor-array design, offering compact and interpretable solutions suited to data-limited conditions common in chemical and biological sensing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.