Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42003378›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of occupational medicine and environmental health2026

The implementation of the urinalysis method for

Katarzyna Rzemek, Małgorzata Dymecka

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katarzyna RzemekRadiation Protection Measurements Laboratory, Otwock, Poland (National Centre for Nuclear Research).
Małgorzata DymeckaRadiation Protection Measurements Laboratory, Otwock, Poland (National Centre for Nuclear Research).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study is focused on internal exposure to MATERIAL AND

methodsThe presented method for determination of

resultsThe method was validated in interlaboratory comparison and implemented in Radiation Protection Measurements Laboratory (Laboratorium Pomiarów Dozymetrycznych - LPD) of the National Centre for Nuclear Research in Poland. Precision, selectivity and detection limit were also characterized in validation process. The implemented method allowed to obtain relatively high values of tracer recovery (

conclusionsConducted analyses of urine samples collected from selected industrial workers confirmed that radiation exposure to

Indexed as

Occupational ExposurePoloniumRadiation MonitoringUrinalysisHumansIndustryPolandPoloniumPolonium-210alpha spectrometrymethod validationNORMpoloniumradiation exposureurine analysis

Identifiers

PMID42003378
PMCPMC13229164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.