ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
ChloroScan: Recovering Plastid Genome Bins From Metagenomic Data.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-resolved metagenomics has contributed greatly to discovering prokaryotic genomes. When applied to microscopic eukaryotes (protists), challenges such as the high number of introns and repeat regions found in nuclear genomes have hampered the mining and discovery of novel protistan lineages. Organellar genomes are simpler, smaller, have higher abundance than their nuclear counterparts and contain valuable phylogenetic information, but are yet to be widely used to identify new protist lineages from metagenomes. Here we present "ChloroScan", a new bioinformatics pipeline to extract eukaryotic plastid genomes from metagenomes. It incorporates a deep learning contig classifier to identify putative plastid contigs and an automated binning module to recover bins with guidance from a curated marker gene database. Additionally, ChloroScan summarizes the results in different user-friendly formats, including annotated coding sequences and proteins for each bin. We show that ChloroScan recovers more high-quality plastid bins than MetaBAT2 for simulated metagenomes. The practical utility of ChloroScan is illustrated by recovering 16 medium to high-quality metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs) from four protist-size-fraction metagenomes, with several bins showing high taxonomic novelty. The ChloroScan code (v0.1.7) is available at https://github.com/Andyargueasae/chloroscan/tree/release_v0.1.7 under Apache-2.0 licence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.