Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42003278›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2026

Progressive Cartilage Degeneration After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Longitudinal Evidence From the Swedish Knee Ligament Registry.

Piero Agostinone, Iacopo Romandini, Pierre Rotzius, Stefano Zaffagnini, Magnus Forssblad, Alexander Sandon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Piero AgostinoneDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5024-6944
Iacopo RomandiniClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2376-3102
Pierre RotziusSödersjukhuset/Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefano ZaffagniniDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Magnus ForssbladDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexander SandonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0124-5782

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChondral lesions and subsequent knee osteoarthritis often occur after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, and although ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is common, cartilage degeneration remains more prevalent than in the general population, with inconsistent evidence on whether surgery offers a protective effect. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to evaluate the progression of cartilage damage after ACLR using second-look arthroscopy in patients who underwent both primary and revision procedures and to identify risk factors for cartilage degeneration. It was hypothesized that chondral lesions would progress between primary and revision surgery, primarily influenced by characteristics of the initial injury and primary surgery. STUDY

designCohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using prospectively collected data from the Swedish Knee Ligament Registry. All patients who underwent both primary and revision ACLR between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2023, were included. Patients with multiligament injuries or missing key data were excluded. The prevalence, location, and severity of cartilage lesions assessed intraoperatively at both primary and revision ACLR were reported and compared. Secondarily, potential risk factors for cartilage damage at the time of revision surgery were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis, incorporating available patient and surgical variables from the registry.

resultsA total of 2845 patients were included. The prevalence, size, and severity of cartilage lesions increased markedly across all knee compartments between primary and revision ACLR, which occurred at a median of 2.4 years later. We found 4 independent risk factors for cartilage damage at revision surgery: older age, meniscal and cartilage lesions at primary surgery, and longer time from primary injury to revision ACLR. Each additional month from the initial injury to revision ACLR was associated with a 0.7% increase in the odds of cartilage damage, underscoring a time-dependent degenerative process.

conclusionThis study showed a clear progression of cartilage degeneration between primary and revision ACLR. Although limited to patients requiring revision surgery, these findings contribute to the broader understanding of posttraumatic joint deterioration and reinforce the need for interdisciplinary approaches to mitigate long-term cartilage damage.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesOsteoarthritis, KneeAdolescentAdultArthroscopyDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesReoperationACLarticular cartilageepidemiologyknee

Identifiers

PMID42003278
PMCPMC13279969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.