Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2026
Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab and Chemotherapy for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Efficacy and Safety Results of an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial.
Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising results in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer. This open-label, single-arm, prospective, monocentric trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant atezolizumab plus carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel in patients with resectable non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Patients with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in stage II, IIIA, and select IIIB (T3N2 only) were treated with atezolizumab and carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel for 3 cycles followed by curative intent surgery. Major pathologic response (MPR) was defined as primary endpoint. 20 patients with histologically confirmed pulmonary adenocarcinoma in TNM-stage IIA (n = 1, 5%), stage IIB (n = 7, 35%), and stage IIIA (n = 12, 60%) were enrolled and treated according to the study protocol. 151 treatment-related adverse events were recorded, and 13 patients (65%) had treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher. There were no grade 5 events. All patients underwent complete anatomical resection (R0). MPR was observed in 9 patients (45%), including 5 (25%) patients with complete pathological response. The proportion of remaining viable tumor showed a significant but weak association to the relative tumor size change in CT (p = 0.018) and the relative change in SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.