ArticleHippocampus2026
Micro-Stimulation Timing Framed Around an Averaged Theta Period of Stimulation Determines Hippocampal Recruitment in Cued Fear Conditioning.
Article in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The importance of precise timing of neuronal activity, relative to ongoing slower oscillations, is reshaping the engram theory and our understanding of how memories are encoded and stored. The hippocampal theta-wave phase-encoding of neuronal firing predicts behavioral outcomes and cognitive performance in memory tasks. A single external stimulus or a sensory/cognitive cue may induce Phase-Resetting shift of theta waves, without changing their frequency or power. This phenomenon seems to be a core mechanism for temporal coordination, information encoding, and memory formation. We hypothesize that not only Phase-Resetting, but temporally coded neuromodulation packaged around an averaged theta cycle of 140 ms, plays a role in engram formation. Inter-pulse microstimulation patterns (MS) consisting of six stimuli within a 140 ms period were applied to the intermedial CA3 hippocampal area of C57/BL6 mice. Each MS-pattern consisted of a 10-bit word (each bit representing a 14-ms bin), indicating the phase at which MS was applied. The randomized (MSr) or fixed pattern (MSf) stimulus was applied during a 30 s presentation of a pure tone (CS) that terminated with a 2 s/0.4 mA footshock (US). Sham animals underwent surgery and cued fear conditioning, but no MS. Cued fear memory was tested by presenting the CS (without MS) in a different context. The group of mice that received the MSf during conditioning showed higher levels of freezing compared to the Sham group; the MSr group did not. We measured c-Fos/NeuN labeling as a proxy for neuronal activity 90 min after memory retrieval. As expected, since cued-fear memory is predominantly amygdala-dependent, all groups showed an increase in c-Fos expression in the amygdala. However, only the MSf group had higher hippocampal activation after retrieval, suggesting that fixed pattern stimulation framed around an averaged theta cycle led to neuronal integration into the memory trace. Our findings indicate that temporal organization plays a crucial role in how memories are stored and accessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.