ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Self-Supervised Deep Learning Framework for Rician Distribution Based Denoising and Modeling of Multi-b Prostate Diffusion MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combined ADC and TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeConvolutional neural networks (CNNs) are evaluated for improved and accelerated denoising and Rician bias correction in multi-b DW images with simultaneous signal modeling.
methodsProstate diffusion images from 46 individuals acquired at 20 linearly distributed b-values (
resultsFor all signal models, synthetic DW images generated from CNN output are of similar quality compared to OBSIDIAN, a model-based method employing iterative pixel-wise fitting. Computed ADC and parameter maps obtained with CNN models were less noisy than those obtained with OBSIDIAN. Good quantitative agreement with OBSIDIAN in ROI-averaged ADC values and, to a slightly lesser extent, kurtosis model parameters was observed. Results with omitted Rician bias correction clearly deviate, while the impact of the noise map input for the CNNs is less pronounced. Computation time was reduced to seconds compared to several hours for OBSIDIAN.
conclusionThe CNN-based method has potential in clinical use for achieving higher quality DW images and biomarker maps with drastically reduced computation time. Further refinement and larger training datasets are needed to achieve better generalizability and increased robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.