Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42003107›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026

A primary central source determines perturbation-evoked N1 amplitudes in younger adults.

Janna Protzak, Jasmine L Mirdamadi, Michael R Borich, Lena H Ting

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janna ProtzakThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4008-8671
Jasmine L MirdamadiDivision of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Michael R BorichThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9897-9867
Lena H TingThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.

Funding

Neuromechanical Modeling of Postural Responses:Mechanisms of Balance Impairments in Parkinson's DiseaseR01HD046922 · NICHD · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Michael Robert Borich, Lena H Ting · 2004 to 2026
$7.7M
Individual-specific engagement of cortical resources for standing balance control in aging and post strokeR01AG072756 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Michael Robert Borich, Lena H Ting · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
McCamish Blue Sky GrantNIA NIH HHS R01 AG072756NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD046922Udall Foundation (The Udall Foundation)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The balance perturbation-evoked N1 potential is a reliable cortical response during reactive balance control that is correlated to a variety of cognitive and motor functions. Although the supplementary motor area (SMA) has been identified as the primary source of the N1, it is less understood whether other brain regions contribute to the N1 recorded at the scalp. We used source localization on electroencephalography (EEG) data from 25 younger adults recorded during backward whole body perturbations during stance. We identified the sources that contribute to channel-based N1 recordings and quantified their impact on N1 amplitude and latency. In younger adults, N1 amplitudes can be explained by one single source in a central midline cortical region covering the SMA. When reconstructing N1 signals using backprojections with one versus all independent components (ICs) identified as brain sources there was no difference in peak amplitudes and a small but significant difference in N1 peak latencies. Parallel brain sources thus deflect the time course of the N1, but not its magnitude. Brain areas associated with ICs contributing to the shift in N1 latency varied between participants. Our results emphasize the dominant influence of central cortical areas on the N1 response, informing hypotheses regarding the nature of the signal and its functional role. Importantly, the extent and location of other cortical structures that influence N1 timing, such as parietal cortex areas and the anterior cingulate cortex, may further elucidate cortical contributions to balance. These markers could be crucial for the early detection of balance problems in clinical populations.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsMotor CortexPostural BalanceAdolescentAdultBrain MappingElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultbalanceelectroencephalographyperturbation-evoked N1supplementary motor area

Identifiers

PMID42003107
PMCPMC13419635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.