ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Quantifying setup uncertainty between computed tomography guidance and magnetic resonance guidance in intramuscular metastases radiotherapy.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantifying setup uncertainty between computed tomography guidance and magnetic resonance guidance in intramuscular metastases radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeMR-Linac (MRL) is well-suited for treatment of oligometastatic disease (OMD) in muscle due to its superior soft tissue contrast. The purpose of this study was to assess dosimetric differences and quantify margins when CT-guidance (CTgRT) is used for OMD treatment compared to MR-guidance (MRgRT) on the MRL. MATERIALS AND
methodsFive patients with intramuscular oligometastasis were treated with the MRL using daily MRgRT. To simulate CT-based alignment, an in-house deep learning model was used to generate synthetic-CT images from MR images for each fraction. The synthetic-CTs were independently aligned to the corresponding simulation-CTs by seven physicists using rigid registration. The difference between CTgRT and MRgRT alignment was calculated to quantify the inter-fractional image-guidance uncertainty and estimate PTV margins. Dose from the clinical beam sets was recalculated on the synthetic-CTs for comparative analysis.
resultsThe CTgRT alignment compared to MRgRT were -0.59 ± 3.49 mm, 2.04 ± 3.96 mm, and 1.23 ± 1.20 mm in left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively. Compared to clinical plans, the dosimetric parameters of recalculated synthetic-CT plans, V95 and D95, were significantly lower, while the homogeneity index was significantly higher (p < 0.001 for each metric). Compared to MRgRT, CTgRT required additional treatment margins of 10.0 mm in LR, 11.5 mm in SI, and 4.6 mm in AP directions.
conclusionsWe quantified the dosimetric difference in treating intramuscular metastases using MRgRT versus CTgRT and showed that treatment margin can be reduced by at least 5 mm in each direction with MRgRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.