Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42003035›Full record

ArticleBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2026

How Are Deprescribing Clinical Practice Guidelines Disseminated and Implemented? A Cross-Sectional Study of International Organisational Stakeholders.

Chun Hei Justin Cheng, Danijela Gnjidic, Stephanie Mathieson, Barbara J Farrell, Lisa M McCarthy, Wade Thompson, Carl R Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chun Hei Justin ChengFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7062-7368
Danijela GnjidicFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephanie MathiesonFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Barbara J FarrellDepartment of Family Medicine, Bruyère Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa M McCarthyLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wade ThompsonDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Carl R SchneiderFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-5609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeprescribing guidelines support safe medication cessation and complement clinical practice guidelines. However, limited evidence exists on the strategies used by organisations and policy bodies to disseminate and implement such guidelines and their impact. The study aimed to identify dissemination and implementation practices of deprescribing guidelines across international organisations.

methodsAn explanatory mixed-methods design was used, comprising (a) a content-validated 44-item survey comprising components based on the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework and (b) qualitative interviews with survey respondents that provided deeper insights.

resultsOf the 75 unique visitors, 47 respondents from 14 countries provided analysable data (24 completed responses); five participated in a follow-up interview. Whereas 12 out of 27 respondents reported organisational tailoring of guidelines for local context, 18 out of 24 reported a lack of planning for implementation, dissemination and/or evaluation. Nineteen out of 24 respondents reported no monitoring of implementation outcomes. Although only three respondents reported provision of ongoing training and support, 25 out of 32 believed that guideline uptake could be improved. DISCUSSION: Although deprescribing guidelines have gained international attraction, organisations frequently overlook the need for implementation evaluation and the sustainment of implementation. Without attention to these aspects, organisations risk undermining their efforts to implement deprescribing guidelines.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsGuideline AdherenceInformation DisseminationPractice Guidelines as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesHumansStakeholder ParticipationSurveys and Questionnairesdeprescribingevidence‐based guidelinesovertreatmentpolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID42003035
PMCPMC13092885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.